Featured post

Please read: What to do if the links to transcriptions don't work

馃槱  All the links embedded in posts before 1 August 2020 are broken. As a workaround, please go directly to my repository on Google Drive  ...

Tuesday, 21 July 2020

Mulliner: Pavan on passamezzo antico

 Simple variations on a Renaissance ground


A pleasure to transcribe. The MS is clean and (I think) almost error free – and what's more all the notes add up. (Mulliner did vary his system of writing: mostly with single "flag" note stems, but sometimes with the "grid-iron" format, as in the final two notes shown below.)

I have used Mulliner's barring, which means that the piece is in 4/2 time; since I don’t find this easy to read, I have inserted dashed bar-lines at the mid-points.

The Mulliner Book: the first two lines of the pavan in the MS, folios 120v – 121v. (The book was ruled for a 6-course instrument.)
The small + signs indicate some kind of ornament; I have not included them in the score.

Facsimile at the British Library:
 http://www.bl.uk/manuscripts/Viewer.aspx?ref=add_ms_30513_fs001r. 

The first statement is mainly a single note melody with chordal accompaniment, the chords being in their lowest positions. The second is very similar in concept but with extensive divisions based on scale fragments, particularly in the second half of each bar.

This is more developed than some music for gittern and cittern, which involved little more than strums with simple runs on the upper strings: you can see these in pieces I have blogged from the Osborn Commonplace Book. If you feel like a strum, just add 4-note versions of those chords that have fewer than 4 notes, and bash away, at least for the statement.

You may have noticed that I am collecting pieces based on the passamezzo antico ground (chord sequence). This one keeps very closely to the format, but it is set in C minor rather than the usual G minor. The only small quirk is the inclusion of an F chord (IV) in the penultimate bars.

Available to download freely in the following formats:



Monday, 20 July 2020

Mulliner: Chi passa

A Tudor or Jacobean guitar piece based on an Italian song


This piece occurs in MS in The Mulliner Book (very approximately 1650), Folios 119v – 120v, in the British Library.
Folio 119v of The Mulliner Book  (very approximately 1650), in the British Library. Facsimile at http://www.bl.uk/manuscripts/Viewer.aspx?ref=add_ms_30513_fs001r. (Folios 119v – 120v.)
Note the word "gitterne" at the top left: most of the arrangements in the MS are for cittern.

The original song was ”Chi passa per sa strada” by Filippo Azzaiolo. I found a neat and helpful transcription at http://stcpress.org/miscellaneous/chi_passa/chi_passa.pdf

This transcription has been made from the facsimile, with a few modifications noted in the score. Section A was informed by the transcription by Page (2017); in particular, his bar 8 was added to maintain the structure of the original song (here it is bar 7).

There are a few disagreements between the original song and Mulliner’s gittern arrangement, so some adjustments would be needed to perform the two together.

I have transcribed the piece into 3/4 time, but Page uses 6/4 time, which is probably more correct, and the song is in 6/2.

In the MS the first line of the tabs is barred regularly, as I have transcribed it here, but later becomes erratic. I have done my best to tidy things up. Bars 6, 15, 26 and 37 seem to be written in a hemiola rhythm, and I have barred them in 3/2 time. In the midst of fairly orthodox divisions, bar 13 is particularly inventive and attractive.

Page describes the piece as
“… an essentially two-part idiom, punctuated by four-note chords … the result is a lively and even bravura alternation between running, ornamented passagework on one hand and plucked or strummed chords on the other.” 
It’s not difficult to play, and you can make different effects on the block chords by plucking or by the more percussive strumming.

There are ornaments (of obscure meaning) marked in the MS, but I have not shown them here.

The harmonic structure of the original song (set, almost inevitably, in Gm) is:

§A:   V   |V        |i            |i           || (bis)

§B:   VII |VII i ii |III  iv  VII |iv  V |i  V  i  iv  V |I   || (bis)

This seems to be a variation on the later folia ground below (I have split the sequence onto two lines to make the agreement clearer):

V   | i   |

VII | III | VII   | i V  | i or I  ||

The harmonies of this gittern version follow the same broad pattern, but with more movement, and with i (Gm) often disguised as III (Bb).

It's good fun to play, and you can download the arrangements in the following formats:

Thursday, 16 July 2020

Spignall: Cydippe Pauan

Cittern music transcribed for the ukulele

I recently treated myself to a copy of Sprightly and Cheerful Music by John M Ward (Pub: Lute Society, 1983). A most erudite publication, covering music in MS and print for the cittern and gittern/guitar in 16th and 17th-century England.

My main aim was to mine it for music to play, preferably obscure.

There is a lot of uncertainty about what was a gittern and what a guitar. Ward implies that a gittern was a cittern tuned like a guitar. I get the impression that he preferred the cittern.

Ever curious, I decided to transcribe a cittern piece, and see how it played on the ukulele (and Renaissance guitar).

Jan Vermeer: Lady with a letter (and cittern)


I have never seen a cittern. It differed from the guitar in having a teardrop-shaped body, and paired wire strings that went over a free bridge, and were attached to the base of the body. It had a longer existence than the 4-course guitar (which was replaced in the 1600s by the 5-course Baroque guitar) and carried on into the 18th century.

In the Tudor period they were tuned in a number of ways, which must have been very confusing. The commonest was:

1st  E4
2nd D4
3rd G3
4th B3

So, it was re-entrant, and difficult to get my head around. Fortunately, the music setting software I use (TablEdit) let me create a virtual cittern, and enter the tablature directly from the transcription in Ward, pp 52 – 53). This gave me both tabs and mensural notation. It was then possible to intabulate for the Ukulele from the notation. Both instruments being tuned in G (at least notionally),  this was not too difficult. Below you can see the first 4 bars of Ward's transcription ...

Ward 1983, p. 52.
The fingering positions: a = nut (open), b = fret 1, c = 2 ... y = i = 8, and so on.
 ... and the same bars in the TablEdit editing screen ...
From the top: Cittern notation and tabs, low-G ukulele notation and tabs


Cydippe (Ancient Greek: 螝蠀未委蟺蟺畏, Kud铆pp膿) could have been one of a number of Greeks in classical times, including one of the Naiads (water nymphs). I don't know to which one this piece was dedicated.

The arrangement fits pretty well on the uke, despite the weird tuning of the cittern. I have tried to keep as close as possible to the original, although some chords might be easier on the ukulele if other inversions are used.

I have changed the first chord in bar 11 to D major (sus 2) as the original chord sounds horrible. It then forms a bridge between the previous chord (A) and the next (G). The original discordant version is appended to the arrangement, for your delectation.

There are 3 strains of 8 bars (4 + 4), set in G, D and G. The harmonies can change rapidly, and the whole piece feels that it is an elaboration of grounds (block chords). In Ward’s book, many of the cittern pieces given as tablatures are obviously strums with single-string work, played using a quill as a plectrum. I chose this piece as it seems more suitable to finger-style.

This being the blog of someone learning as he goes along, I shamelessly follow Ward’s scholarship, and append a strummed consort version of the same name (almost) by John Farmer, which Ward transcribed from a publication (Rosseter 1609). Bar 17 in the published transcription contains enough notes for 2 bars, so I have split it, which also brings the total neatly up to 24 bars. The harmonic structure is broadly similar to that in more elaborate version (the three sections set in G, D and G), but the whole is much simpler and practically all chords are in nut position.

Available to download free in the following formats:

  • pdf
  • TablEdit (including both cittern and ukulele scores)
  • MIDI (Basic; watch out for the horrible chord between pieces.)

Have fun!

Friday, 10 July 2020

Le Roy: Petite fantasie

A simple fantasy from Le Roy's guitar tutor

A popular music combo of viol, guitar (gittern) and a small lute (it's not a cittern as the strings are attached to the bridge), some years after the tutor was published
From Ward, JM (1981) Sprightly and cheerful musick. The Lute Society


This charming fantasy is built on a tuning exercise. The first few bars are missing due to damage. I have added the original exercise to the end of the setting, in case your curiosity is tickled – it could be used as an introduction to the fantasy.

As the piece is taken from a tutor, and as I still have so much to learn, I have rather emphasised the didactic content. It has been transcribed from remnants of Adrian Le Roy (1569) An instruction to the Gitterne, London, and shown in facsimile in Page (2017) The Guitar in Tudor England, CUP, pp 92 – 93 with a transcription for modern guitar on p 105. Most of the learning in this account is therefore second-hand. at least!

You will find that there are several compositional forms in the fantasy: following some simple scale work, we see:

 (a) a counterpoint of overlapping scale fragments (e.g. bars 16 – 24);
 (b) duets (e.g. bars 25 – 31, 49 – 52); and
 (c) responses between voices (e.g. bars 46 – 50, 54 – 58).

As Page points out, the piece shares some motifs (bars 48 – 52, 58 – 61) with Le Roy’s own “Fantasie premi猫re” (previously posted here on this blog), for which it serves as a perfect primer.
 
Le Roy indicated unaccented single notes with a dot (prick) beneath, meaning that they were to be played with the index (or possibly middle) finger rather than the thumb. Other (accented) single notes would have been played with the (stronger) thumb, and possibly the middle finger. This emphasises the rhythmic pattern. (There is some diversity of opinion on exactly how the dots were interpreted.)

Most of the paired notes are played as a duet with thumb and finger, but Le Roy indicated where pairs were to be played with the fingers only. I have expanded every marked (pricked) note(s) using the p-i-m-a system.

I have also expanded on the other rules, but only in the first bar in which they are relevant. At the risk of over-egging the pudding, I have also included the pricks into the tabs as, once one gets used to the system, it is easier to read than p-i-m-a when playing.

In the MIDI version I have tried to represent this by applying the following simple rules:

(a) The first beat in each bar is set at ff.
(b) All other notes are set at f (though possibly the second minim (half-note) should be set at 1.5 × f.
(c) Previous rules are overwritten by the pricked notes, where all notes are set at mf.

Not very subtle, but it gives an impression.

 Downloads


Available to download free in the following formats:



Wednesday, 8 July 2020

Osborn commonplace book part 2: three short pieces

Some simple Tudor strums with ersatz elaborations

There is very little extant Renaissance guitar music written in England, but in The Osborn Commonplace Book there are a number of pages dedicated to the instrument. I have previously blogged most of them here (in revised format). For the sake of completeness here are three more.

Having complained in an earlier post about the lack of a discernible melody in song intabulations by Le Roy, I now (inconsistently) present these rare but minimal pieces.


Two simple galliard strums from The Osborn Commonplace Book, f. 47r
A bit like a fake book, but without the melody.

Basically, the first two pieces are a pair of simple strums entitled "gallyard", possibly to a melody or dance which we do not have. In transcription I have followed the original manuscript closely, and presume that the syncopations across bars are what was intended. (The bar-lines in the MS refer, I think, to sections of the original air or verse.) I used stem directions to make for clear reading rather than to represent different voices – though the first string may contain an echo of the original airs.

The modern ukulele player will find the chord shapes reassuringly familiar. There is often no attempt to root the chords, which implies strumming: you presumably bashed away to your heart's content.
They do, however, make thin pickings for the ukulele player, so I have presumptuously added some variations to the first two (the galliards), along the lines of Le Roy's elaborations in the previous post . All a bit of fun, but they are quite playable. Have a go!

Note added 10/7/2020. The day after I made this post, a copy of John M Ward's Cheerful and Sprightly Musick dropped through the letterbox. I hadn't realised it, but the book contains transcriptions of all the Osborn guitar pieces. Brilliant!

It transpires that Ward barred these galliards not in constant 6/4 time, but in a mixture of 3/4 and 6/4. This format certainly skips round the syncopation across bars in the 6/4 version. For the uber-geek I have added a link below to a pdf file showing the two transcription styles. Something to get my head round.

Analysis

First galliard (No. 10)

The harmonic structure is simple and in the key of C major, using I, II, IV, V:

C G C F / C  |  G / D G /  /  |  C G C  F / C    |  C G / C /  /  |
C C F C /  / |  G / D G /  /  |  C  /  F C  /  G |  G C / C /  /  ||

These are the chords of the passamezzo moderno ground, but in a different order.
See my blog on Renaissance grounds (chord sequences).

Second galliard (No. 11)

Again, simple harmonies (I, (IV), V, vi, ♭VII),:

C / G C /  / | G C G B♭ /  /  | B♭ /  /  C /  / | G Am* / G /  / |
C / G C /  / | G C G B♭ /  /  | B♭ /  /  C /  / |  C G /  C /  / |
C / F C /  G | F G /  C  /  /  ||

[Am* indicates a harmonic movement that may be parsed as Am7 Am6 in modern terminology: quite unexpected in such a simple strum.]

The harmony moves unexpectedly (to modern ears) into B♭ (♭VII), which is typical of the passamezzo antico, although it doesn't follow that pattern.

Verse setting (No. 6, no title)


A rather more complex strum from same MS.

For this piece I had the luxury of transcribing for ukulele with the aid of Page’s version for modern guitar (in The Guitar in Tudor England, pp 143 – 4, see Resources page), which certainly helped with reading the cramped calligraphy of the MS and getting the timings sorted.

Page has reconstructed a three part vocal original;  I have indicated the presumed melody notes by upward stems and by highlighting them in yellow, although they are somewhat confused during the decorated cadences in bars 7 and 15. He also shows how the instrumental part can fit a popular Tudor verse form and also be used as a setting for metrical psalms.

The harmonies are:

F      | A   F    | Am   F   | C        | C            | G   Am    | E        | A      | A // …
Am  | G  Em  | Dm        | C  G   | Am  Dm | G            | A        | D      | D      ||

It is evident that the second half, resolving in A major, does not really reflect the first half, which resolves in D major. The only explanation that I can see is that the final D is the major form of Dm, the relative minor of the first chord, F. If the D is due to the application of the tierce de Picardie then the home key may be Dm.
This gives us the chord set: i, I, ii, II, III, IV, v, V, VII. Phew!

Downloads


A compilation of the three pieces is free to download in the following formats:
Also, a concordance of the two setting possibilities can be found here.




Tuesday, 7 July 2020

Le Roy: Les buffons (development of pasamezzo moderna and romanesca grounds)

This post shows how simple chord sequences were elaborated.

The other day I was re-reading Christopher Page's The guitar in Tudor England (see Resources page), which illustrates the remaining fragments of a guitar tutor by Adrian Le Roy. The original French version is lost, and all we have are eight pages of the English version published in 1569.



Transcription

The facsimilies are fairly clear, so I thought I'd transcribe four pages that illustrate the development by elaboration of simple well-established Renaissance grounds (chord sequences). They are shown on pp 94 & 95 of Page's book.

The tutor combines the two grounds passamezzo moderno and romanesca to form a piece called Les buffons, referring to a comic or rustic dance style.

  • The first page shows the piece in the form of basic block chords, possibly strummed. These will be very familiar to the ukulele player. 
  • In the second page the chords are elaborated with simple divisions, indicated as plus diminu茅s. 
  • The third and fourth pages show the passamezzo and romanesca more elaborated with more rapid divisions (plus fradonnes).
For the first two levels I have referred to Page’s transcriptions (p. 114).

The term “fredonn茅” is described by Page as a contemporary term which “expresses the lightness and elaboration of birdsong, or the freshness of youth.” (So that’s what it should sound like!)

On the other hand, Ward (1983) gives a definition from 1611 as: “Fredon: A semie-quauer or Semie-semie quauer, in Musicke: and hence, Diuision; and a warbling, shaking, or quavering”.

In the interests of understanding how elaboration was done (this blog is, after all, a fair copy of my self-imposed homework) I have rearranged the pieces so that all the passamezzi are put together, then all the romanescas.

The usual forms of the grounds were as follows:

Passamezzo moderno: I   | IV  | I | V | I   | IV  | I, V | I  || 

Romanesca:                 III | VII | i | V | III | VII | i, V | i  ||

Both pieces in the tutor are set in C major, which means that the romanesca (which would typically have been in the minor key), here needs flattened III and VII harmonies, i.e. chords E♭ and B♭.

Transcription notes

1. Square brackets in the transcription indicate positions of missing fragments: the fingerings have been entered editorially, the earlier ones following Page, p114.

2. † (in the score): In the original these notes were displaced, I think, one position to the left; I have moved them over.

3. I have preserved the contemporary spellings.

Playing

Le Roy indicated unaccented single notes with a dot ("prick") beneath, meaning that they were to be played with the index (or possibly middle) finger rather than the thumb. I have indicated these by the conventional “i” in the p-i-m-a system. Other (accented) single notes would have been played with the (stronger) thumb, and possibly the middle finger. This emphasises the rhythmic pattern.

The grounds (block chords) could well have been played by strumming or plucking – we don’t really know. If plucked, then the single note on the top string could have been touched by the index finger on the up stroke, whilst the block chords on the 1st and 3rd beats were strummed with down strokes. The 4th beat could, I suppose, be played up or down: Le Roy gives no "prick", so down is the most probable.

Anyway, do give it a try.

Downloads


Available for download in the following formats:



Friday, 3 July 2020

Trad (Welsh): Dafydd y Garreg Wen (David of the White Rock)

My previous two posts were transcriptions of songs entabulated by Adrian Le Roy in the 1550s. I must admit that I found them difficult to understand and (to my simple ears) not much like songs.

So, I decided to start with a song I know well, and transcribe it myself. The words of the song, added much later, concern an ailing harpist playing his last tune before he dies. Not a cheerful subject, but a wonderful melody.

Although of chordal structure, it can be harmonised in many ways, and I have chosen two versions as a basis for my own. In the arrangements (see links below) they are preceded by a statement of the melody and lyrics. The lyrics were written by John Ceiriog Hughes (1832 - 1837) who was sometimes known as the “Welsh Wordsworth” for his unaffected style.

The first arrangement is based on a version for (appropriately) harp by John Thomas who was harpist to Queen Victoria. I publish here only the melody and something approaching Thomas' harmonies: the introduction and variations are not really suitable for the ukulele.

The second arrangement is based on a version by Harold Davidson in a community songbook published almost 100 years ago. The harmonies make use of more minor chords, and seem more appropriate to the sentiment of the piece. It concludes with my attempt at writing a variation in the style of Renaissance divisions, whilst using harp-like patterns as far as I can achieve them on 4 strings.

Normally only the first two verses are used, but I have downloaded all five of them and made an attempt at a literal translation. You can see them both in the transcriptions and at the foot of this page.

Available for free download in the following formats:



The sources are:

1. John Thomas in Welsh melodies for the harp. London, Edwin Ashdown, c 1890.
2. Harold Davidson in Daily Express community song book, Ed. John Goss, London, 1927.
3. https://tunearch.org/wiki/Annotation:Dafydd_y_Garreg_Wen

REFERENCES

1. Bryn Terfel sings the song here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3dKbGNBYi2k
2. An article on the “Welsh” triple harp: http://teires.tth7.co.uk/en/triple-harp.php
3. The original words: http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/3500


LYRICS

WELSH WORDS by John Ceiriog Hughes

'Cariwch', medd Dafydd, 'fy nhelyn i mi,
Ceisiaf cyn marw roi t么n arni hi.
Codwch fy nwylo i gyraedd y tant;
Duw a'ch bendithio fy ngweddw a'm plant!'

'Neithiwr mi glywais lais angel fel hyn:
"Dafydd, tyrd adref, a chwarae trwy'r glyn!"
Delyn fy mebyd, ffarwel i dy dant!
Duw a'ch bendithio fy ngweddw a'm plant!'

“Estynwyd y delyn, yr hon yn ddioed
Ollyngodd alawon na chlywsid erioed;
’Roedd pob tant yn canu’i ffarweliad ei hun,
A Dafydd yn marw wrth gyffwrdd pob un.

“O! cleddwch fi gartref yn hen Ynys F么n,
Yn llwch y Derwyddon, a hon fyddo’r d么n,
“Y dydd y’m gosodir fi’n isel fy mhen,”—
A’i fysedd chwareuant yr “Hen Garreg Wen.”

Roedd Dafydd yn marw, pan safem yn fud
I wylio datodiad rhwng bywyd a byd;
Yn s诺n yr hen delyn gogwyddodd ei ben,
Ac angau rodd fywyd i’r “Hen Garreg Wen.”

 From: John Ceiriog Hughes, Ceiriog, Gutenberg Press.
______

DIRECT TRANSLATION (very literal)

‘Carry’, said David, ‘My harp to me,
I want before dying to make a tune on it.’
‘Lift my hands to reach the strings,
O God bless you, my widow and children.’

‘Last night I heard the voice of an angel like this:
“Dafydd come home to play through the valley”.
Harp of my youth, farewell to your music [or strings],
O God bless you, my widow and children.’

The harp was passed to him without delay
And released a melody never before heard;
Each string singing to say its own farewell,
And Dafydd dies [fades] at the touch of each one.

‘Oh, bury me home in ancient Ynys M么n [Anglesey]
In the dust of the Druids, and this will be my tune,
The day I am laid low [dead and buried]’ –
And his fingers played the “Old White Rock”.

Dafydd was dying, and we fell silent
To see him released between life and the earth;
At the sound of the harp he tilted [dropped] his head,
And death gave life to the “Old White Rock”.